Short sentences, each containing one single thought, are easier to read than long sentences.  Sentences should be short and simple.

If your sentences average 15 or more words, see where you can break them into two shorter sentences.  Paragraphs should have three to four sentences.  This approach will create smaller chunks of information that the reader will be able to absorb and act upon.

Remember, the more your writing deviates from this clear and to-the-point structure, the harder it will be to understand.

Examples:

BEFORE
This is a reminder to all residents and business owners of the upcoming public hearing, to be held on January 17 in the Main Conference Room, regarding the proposed waterfront redevelopment project.

AFTER
Public Hearing Reminder

Attention all residents and business owners:

There will be a public hearing to discuss the proposed waterfront redevelopment project.

The hearing will be held on January 17 in the Main Conference Room.


Bob has a great article: Why So Many Americans Can’t Communicate. It’s an interesting piece on the lack of solid communication skills here in America.

You will need to register with PAW to access the complete article, but here’s an excerpt to get you started:

Ever consider why millions of Americans haven’t mastered rudimentary communication skills? Please tell me the answer, because I’m baffled. All I know is that it’s become a tired and lazy theme. Two decades ago, employers were talking about job candidates–many of whom were very smart–lacking communication skills. And they’re still complaining about this.They weren’t just talking about recent high school or college grads, but experienced professionals who had trouble spitting out declarative sentences during interviews. And their written skills were equally atrocious. Resumes were strewn with grammatical errors and poor sentence structure.

The advent of spelling-and-grammar-checking programs didn’t remedy the problem, either. Often, spelling and grammar checks are wrong, because hundreds of English words have multiple meanings. Worst of all, it didn’t teach users anything; it just made them dependent upon yet another technology.

All these writing and editing gadgets made it easier to get through tedious communication tasks quickly. While they can be useful, they never should be taken as gospel, but as a helpful aide. Documents, letters, papers and resumes still have to be meticulously edited. That means not line by line, but word by word–a process most people avoid like the plague.

Interesting, no? Especially considering I don’t always use proper grammar, english – whatever, when blogging and I find myself taking more liberties with words – sometimes even making my own up.
Of course in the business world I write professional content and always try to be clear and concise when communicating. I think a large problem is that often people think communication = talking/speaking (occasionally yelling), and that’s it.
Effective communication is about so much more than talking – think active listening and things like communication style, adjusting style/message for different audiences, drawing out the unsaid, and tons more that are out of scope of this post.
And that’s not even getting into written communication.
If you make it over to the article, check out the comments at the end. I always enjoy reading other’s perspectives on interesting subjects.
Thanks to author Bob Weinstein for sharing his insights on this great piece!

The US Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released its newest Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) in December and “Technical Writer” has its own chapter for the very first time.

Technical Writer

Technical Writer

One of my many hats includes being a technical writer, also called technical communicator, who puts technical information into easily understandable language or a graphic.

You can sometimes find me leading a team conducting usability studies to help improve the design of a product that is in the prototype stage.

But the best part of this type of work are the advances in laptop computers, video conferencing, Google Docs, and wireless communications permit me to work from home, an office, or on the road.

Many view me a communication guru, but I’m just your average – detail oriented, curious, persistent in solving problems, self-motivated, and able to understand complex material and explain it clearly – type of guy.

If this sounds like you too – consider looking for work as a technical writer – jobs are expected to grow 18 percent, or faster than the average for all occupations, from 2008 to 2018.


I was searching for an “iPad” today and noticed a new live feed in my Google results.

See the ”Latest results for…” below or half way down the page of your search results.

Realtime Twitter feed in Google results

It contained real-time Twitter and other website updates for the keyword “iPad” I searched.

It shows you the latest top 3 most recent results and you can scroll down for more.  Below each post is a user and/or website name and how old it is.  The results even have a “Pause” button, so you can stop the scrolling.

This makes me feel like Google is going to leverage the spontaneity of Twitter and not buy it after all.  See more thoughts in my Gwitter post.

How confident does that make you feel in the results?

What do you think of live communication in your search results?

How could you or a business benefit from this new technology?


Most people know that you may meet your next client while riding an elevator. So, you should be able to describe what you do and why it matters in the length of the ride – in one minute or less.

But, I think you may meet your next client online.  Being able to writing well is becoming more important, but being able to write succinctly is even more important. I think you should be able to write what you do and why it matters in one tweet (a 140 characters or less message on Twitter).

People haven’t quit riding elevators, but they are networking and reading more on mobile phones.

It takes time and effort to boil down the essence of what you’re trying to do to a short and memorable idea.

Short introductions are wonderful for three reasons: they are easy to remember, difficult to forget, and seldom fail in delivering the message.

Can you describe what you’re working and why it’s important in 140 characters or less?  Try it.


Listen or Fix?

18May09

When men have a problem and they tell you about it, they want to know how to fix it. When women have a problem and they tell you about it, they just want you to listen. Studies show women generally talk more than men – 20,000 words a day compared to 7,000 words respectively.

You can still struggle with listening to someone describe a problem and trying to solve it.  To me, it’s like placing a thick succulent, juicy steak or a large bowl of steaming, buttery popcorn in front of me and just watching it. My mouth is watering just reading those last words.

I found it very difficult to resist saying what comes to mind in trying to help someone or giving a solution or two before I’ve been asked.

How to just listen and not fix problems

I usually try to focus my mind on actively listening to the person by maintaining eye contact, nodding my head and saying some verbal cues indicating that I understand. 

Asking questions and taking notes often helps you remember your ideas, but can ruin their train of thought and become a distraction.

Write more active listening techniques that work for you in the comments.


I just watched the White House Communications Press Secretary frustrate the media again with his fluff answers about Swine Flu. One of the basics of a senior communications representative is the ability to run a press conference, but often these meetings can communicate the wrong messages. When they do, it’s usually because the leader comes in without the answers that people care most about. Another classic mistake is to come in with the desired information but to deliver it in a way that shows no connection whatsoever with the people in the audience.

Fortunately for all of us, there aren’t many press conferences on preventing a global pandemic of influenza. But, Robert Gibbs tried to share what the government is doing to deal with the rapidly developing outbreak of a new strain of swine flu on in front of the White House press corps on Monday.

Here’s what I noted during the briefing and what leaders can learn from their example:

Be prepared to answer 100 different questions and know your policies Do your homework, it makes you look smart. Admit you don’t know an answer and follow-up next time.

Use your eyes to make personal contact and demonstrate you are listening You shouldn’t be looking around or rolling your eyes when someone asks a question.

Be mindful of what you do with your hands Putting your hands up to stop the talking make you look arrogant. Don’t hug yourself, it looks weak. Don’t lean into crowd, it feels too threatening. Drop your lazy hands on the podium, it make you look tired.

Keep smiling and nodding Taking a deep breath, dancing around, wiping your brow, looking at your watch shows you are stressed.

Don’t laugh at a question, unless it’s really a joke Enough said.

Speak to others like a professional Counting the number of times a question was asked means YOU are not communicating well. Don’t chastise the audience for your problem.

Stand up straight Leaning from one foot and the other means you are uncomfortable and means you are weak.

What else did you see in the  Video?


With all the hype surrounding social networking and self-service help online these days, you may wonder if your customer service center are worth keeping.

Today we are continually learning new behaviors for how to initiate contact with each others via technology.  However, even with all the technological advances, there is a simple truth: people often need to talk with other people to solve problems.

The contact center remains a centerpiece of most corporate or government agency strategy for serving communities, customers, and citizens as they move online and gain the power to set and communicate new benchmarks for quality customer experience.

Even with over 70% of Americans using the Internet, people still want to speak with a ‘live’ person who can address their concerns and deliver a high level of personal, human customer service satisfaction.


Google and Twitter are negotiating a deal now and many people are concerned that the wild-west fun of Twitter will soon end if Google Corporate gets their hands on it.  My concern is how will it affect the way people communicate (tweet)?

Wild West Ending Soon

Like the dotcom bubble from the 90’s, Twitter is growing rapidly and is making up the business rules as they go. They don’t have a business plan and aren’t making any money, but have plenty of funding.

Searching Twitter Now Faster

Recently, Twitter incorporated their real-time search feature onto the user pages.  The search feature beats Google in terms instant speed-to-market search.

Monetize Twitter

With the push of a button Twitter could be turned into a money machine by putting relevant Google ads or other advertising on the site pages and/or auto feeding ads into 140 characters of text and pushing them out in the content streams.

Others ways include licensing corporate versions of Twitter, taking the company public, or selling it to the highest bidder (Facebook) was talking with Twitter last month.

It’s bizarre why so many senior executives at Twitter are leaving. Maybe they know the ultimate plans and didn’t care for becoming the next zillionaire.

Effects of Change

How will any of these changes affect you using Twitter to communicate?

Would ads be a problem? I don’t think they would bother me as long as they are relevant like Facebook’s ads. But, I stopped using Yahoo mail because the advertising was becoming too offensive (jiggley, single females advertising to a married guy with wife and kids in the room – not good).

-David

PS. Follow me on Twitter at @DavidSiecker

 

 

 

 


I just read about a new product called Obama Fingers described as “tender, fried chicken bits (that) come with a tasty curry sauce.” It is the result of a German frozen food company that hoped to hop on the Obama product bandwagon and make some money. 

It already sounds disgusting, then my mind thinks about human fingers, then Obama and the connotation of eating fried chicken.

Unfortunately, the company really didn’t do their homework and says it was “unaware of the possible racist overtones of the product.” 

Whoa! are you kidding me?

Who did they test this product with?

What rock has this company been living under that doesn’t know that this product would offend people?

It communicates immediate distrust of the company and product.  

And in taking a look at the packaging again, what does curry, the San Francisco bridge, and the American flag have to do with Obama or the chicken? And why Germany?

I say scrap this product immediately.  It reminds me of that bad New Coke product from years ago and other Obama products.